Correlation

Spearman's Rank Correlation Table: Critical Values of rₛ

The smallest Spearman correlation that is statistically significant for a given number of pairs.

  • n = 4 to 100
  • Exact for n ≤ 18
  • p-value calculator

Spearman's rho Table

Rows: sample size n · Columns: α (one-tailed on the first header row, two-tailed on the second) · Cells: critical rₛ. Reject H₀ if |rₛ| ≥ the cell.

Spearman's Rank Correlation Table (Critical Values of rho)
One-tailed α →0.050.0250.010.0050.001
Two-tailed α →
n ↓
0.10.050.020.010.002
41.000————
50.9001.0001.000——
60.8290.8860.9431.000—
70.7150.7860.8930.9291.000
80.6430.7390.8340.8810.953
90.6000.7000.7840.8340.917
100.5640.6490.7460.7940.879
110.5370.6190.7100.7550.846
120.5040.5880.6790.7280.819
130.4840.5610.6490.7040.792
140.4640.5390.6270.6800.772
150.4470.5220.6040.6540.750
160.4300.5030.5830.6360.730
170.4150.4880.5670.6180.711
180.4020.4720.5510.6000.693
190.3920.4600.5360.5850.676
200.3810.4470.5220.5700.662
210.3710.4370.5100.5560.647
220.3610.4260.4980.5440.633
230.3530.4170.4870.5320.621
240.3450.4070.4760.5210.609
250.3370.3980.4670.5110.597
260.3310.3910.4580.5010.587
270.3250.3830.4490.4930.577
280.3190.3760.4410.4840.567
290.3120.3690.4330.4750.558
300.3070.3630.4260.4670.549
320.2970.3510.4120.4530.533
340.2880.3400.4000.4390.518
360.2790.3300.3890.4270.504
380.2720.3210.3780.4160.491
400.2640.3130.3690.4060.479
420.2580.3060.3600.3960.468
440.2520.2980.3520.3870.458
460.2460.2920.3440.3790.448
480.2410.2850.3370.3710.439
500.2360.2800.3300.3630.431
550.2250.2660.3140.3470.411
600.2150.2550.3010.3320.394
650.2060.2450.2890.3190.379
700.1990.2360.2790.3070.366
750.1920.2280.2690.2970.354
800.1860.2210.2610.2880.343
850.1800.2140.2530.2790.333
900.1750.2080.2460.2710.323
950.1700.2020.2390.2640.315
1000.1660.1970.2330.2580.307

Tip: click any value to highlight its row and column.

How to read this table

  1. Rank each variable separately and compute rₛ = 1 − 6Σd² / (n(n² − 1)), where d is the difference in ranks for each pair.
  2. Find the row for the number of pairs n and the column for your α.
  3. The correlation is significant if |rₛ| is greater than or equal to the table value.

Worked example

In 12 patients the rank correlation between baseline disease score and time to response is rₛ = 0.65. Row 12, two-tailed α = 0.05 gives 0.588, so the correlation is significant at the 5% level. The two-tailed 0.01 value is 0.728, so 0.01 < p < 0.05.

Click the underlined links to highlight the value in the table.

Calculator

For values between the rows and columns of the table. Results update as you type.

Formula and how the values were computed

rₛ = 1 − 6 Σ dᵢ² / (n(n² − 1))

For n ≤ 18, values come from the exact permutation distribution of Σd², enumerated over all n! orderings. For larger n they use the Edgeworth series approximation of Best and Roberts (AS 89), which the exact values up to n = 18 show to be accurate to about 0.0001 in probability. Each entry is the smallest attainable rₛ with P(rₛ ≥ r) ≤ α, rounded up.

Frequently asked questions

Why do different Spearman tables disagree slightly?

Some tables use approximations such as the t-distribution or report the nearest attainable value rather than the largest one that keeps the error rate at or below α. Differences are usually in the third decimal.

What about ties?

Tied values get the average of their ranks. With ties, compute rₛ as the Pearson correlation of the ranks; the table is then approximate.

Related calculators and tutorials