Correlation
Spearman's Rank Correlation Table: Critical Values of rₛ
The smallest Spearman correlation that is statistically significant for a given number of pairs.
- n = 4 to 100
- Exact for n ≤ 18
- p-value calculator
Spearman's rho Table
Rows: sample size n · Columns: α (one-tailed on the first header row, two-tailed on the second) · Cells: critical rₛ. Reject H₀ if |rₛ| ≥ the cell.
| One-tailed α → | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-tailed α → n ↓ | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 |
| 4 | 1.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | 0.900 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | — |
| 6 | 0.829 | 0.886 | 0.943 | 1.000 | — |
| 7 | 0.715 | 0.786 | 0.893 | 0.929 | 1.000 |
| 8 | 0.643 | 0.739 | 0.834 | 0.881 | 0.953 |
| 9 | 0.600 | 0.700 | 0.784 | 0.834 | 0.917 |
| 10 | 0.564 | 0.649 | 0.746 | 0.794 | 0.879 |
| 11 | 0.537 | 0.619 | 0.710 | 0.755 | 0.846 |
| 12 | 0.504 | 0.588 | 0.679 | 0.728 | 0.819 |
| 13 | 0.484 | 0.561 | 0.649 | 0.704 | 0.792 |
| 14 | 0.464 | 0.539 | 0.627 | 0.680 | 0.772 |
| 15 | 0.447 | 0.522 | 0.604 | 0.654 | 0.750 |
| 16 | 0.430 | 0.503 | 0.583 | 0.636 | 0.730 |
| 17 | 0.415 | 0.488 | 0.567 | 0.618 | 0.711 |
| 18 | 0.402 | 0.472 | 0.551 | 0.600 | 0.693 |
| 19 | 0.392 | 0.460 | 0.536 | 0.585 | 0.676 |
| 20 | 0.381 | 0.447 | 0.522 | 0.570 | 0.662 |
| 21 | 0.371 | 0.437 | 0.510 | 0.556 | 0.647 |
| 22 | 0.361 | 0.426 | 0.498 | 0.544 | 0.633 |
| 23 | 0.353 | 0.417 | 0.487 | 0.532 | 0.621 |
| 24 | 0.345 | 0.407 | 0.476 | 0.521 | 0.609 |
| 25 | 0.337 | 0.398 | 0.467 | 0.511 | 0.597 |
| 26 | 0.331 | 0.391 | 0.458 | 0.501 | 0.587 |
| 27 | 0.325 | 0.383 | 0.449 | 0.493 | 0.577 |
| 28 | 0.319 | 0.376 | 0.441 | 0.484 | 0.567 |
| 29 | 0.312 | 0.369 | 0.433 | 0.475 | 0.558 |
| 30 | 0.307 | 0.363 | 0.426 | 0.467 | 0.549 |
| 32 | 0.297 | 0.351 | 0.412 | 0.453 | 0.533 |
| 34 | 0.288 | 0.340 | 0.400 | 0.439 | 0.518 |
| 36 | 0.279 | 0.330 | 0.389 | 0.427 | 0.504 |
| 38 | 0.272 | 0.321 | 0.378 | 0.416 | 0.491 |
| 40 | 0.264 | 0.313 | 0.369 | 0.406 | 0.479 |
| 42 | 0.258 | 0.306 | 0.360 | 0.396 | 0.468 |
| 44 | 0.252 | 0.298 | 0.352 | 0.387 | 0.458 |
| 46 | 0.246 | 0.292 | 0.344 | 0.379 | 0.448 |
| 48 | 0.241 | 0.285 | 0.337 | 0.371 | 0.439 |
| 50 | 0.236 | 0.280 | 0.330 | 0.363 | 0.431 |
| 55 | 0.225 | 0.266 | 0.314 | 0.347 | 0.411 |
| 60 | 0.215 | 0.255 | 0.301 | 0.332 | 0.394 |
| 65 | 0.206 | 0.245 | 0.289 | 0.319 | 0.379 |
| 70 | 0.199 | 0.236 | 0.279 | 0.307 | 0.366 |
| 75 | 0.192 | 0.228 | 0.269 | 0.297 | 0.354 |
| 80 | 0.186 | 0.221 | 0.261 | 0.288 | 0.343 |
| 85 | 0.180 | 0.214 | 0.253 | 0.279 | 0.333 |
| 90 | 0.175 | 0.208 | 0.246 | 0.271 | 0.323 |
| 95 | 0.170 | 0.202 | 0.239 | 0.264 | 0.315 |
| 100 | 0.166 | 0.197 | 0.233 | 0.258 | 0.307 |
Tip: click any value to highlight its row and column.
How to read this table
- Rank each variable separately and compute rₛ = 1 − 6Σd² / (n(n² − 1)), where d is the difference in ranks for each pair.
- Find the row for the number of pairs n and the column for your α.
- The correlation is significant if |rₛ| is greater than or equal to the table value.
Worked example
In 12 patients the rank correlation between baseline disease score and time to response is rₛ = 0.65. Row 12, two-tailed α = 0.05 gives 0.588, so the correlation is significant at the 5% level. The two-tailed 0.01 value is 0.728, so 0.01 < p < 0.05.
Click the underlined links to highlight the value in the table.
Calculator
For values between the rows and columns of the table. Results update as you type.
Formula and how the values were computed
For n ≤ 18, values come from the exact permutation distribution of Σd², enumerated over all n! orderings. For larger n they use the Edgeworth series approximation of Best and Roberts (AS 89), which the exact values up to n = 18 show to be accurate to about 0.0001 in probability. Each entry is the smallest attainable rₛ with P(rₛ ≥ r) ≤ α, rounded up.
Frequently asked questions
Why do different Spearman tables disagree slightly?
Some tables use approximations such as the t-distribution or report the nearest attainable value rather than the largest one that keeps the error rate at or below α. Differences are usually in the third decimal.
What about ties?
Tied values get the average of their ranks. With ties, compute rₛ as the Pearson correlation of the ranks; the table is then approximate.
Related calculators and tutorials
- CalculatorSpearman Rank Correlation Sample Size
- CalculatorPearson Correlation Sample Size
- CalculatorConfidence Interval for a Correlation Coefficient
- TutorialPearson vs. Spearman Correlation Coefficients
- TutorialNon-Parametric Tests: Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U
- TutorialCorrelation vs. Causation in Clinical Research